Axelle Berthoumieu from France has received a 12-match ban after being convicted of biting Aoife Wafer of Ireland in a match at the 2025 Women’s Rugby World Cup. The verdict, reported by tournament officials, quickly ignited discussion within the rugby world, as it stands as one of the harshest sanctions in recent tournament editions.
The altercation took place during a tightly contested match between France and Ireland, where both sides fought to secure their positions in the group stage. In a moment of close contact, cameras and match officials caught Berthoumieu engaging in conduct deemed unacceptable by international rugby standards. Following the incident, Wafer required medical attention, though she was able to continue playing, showing remarkable resilience and composure. The disciplinary committee reviewed footage, statements, and referee reports before reaching its conclusion, which was then shared publicly to ensure transparency.
The seriousness of the penalty and its consequences
The 12-match suspension given to Berthoumieu represents not just a personal challenge for the French athlete but also a disadvantage for her national squad, as it loses a seasoned player during a crucial phase of the tournament. Rugby officials highlighted that the decision was influenced by established guidelines aimed at maintaining safety, honesty, and fairness in the sport. World Rugby’s rules regard biting as a grave misconduct, with penalties that can vary from moderate suspensions to extended bans, based on the severity of the incident and its impact.
For France, the absence of Berthoumieu means reshuffling their tactical plans and relying on alternative options to fill the gap. Analysts have pointed out that such an incident can affect team morale, as it not only diminishes the squad’s depth but also raises questions about discipline and composure under pressure. On the other side, Ireland’s Wafer has been praised for her professionalism in handling the situation, avoiding escalation and maintaining focus on the match.
Response from the rugby world
Different opinions have emerged in response to the sanction; however, the majority of involved parties concur that the penalty was justified. Supporters, analysts, and ex-players have shown worry that events like this might harm the image of women’s rugby as the sport is drawing more spectators. Numerous people have praised the firm decision of the disciplinary committee, considering it a clear statement that hazardous behavior will not be accepted.
Las redes sociales han intensificado el debate, con simpatizantes de ambos países discutiendo la equidad de la sanción. Mientras que algunos opinan que la suspensión de 12 partidos es demasiado severa, otros consideran que es adecuada y actúa como disuasivo para casos futuros. Exjugadores internacionales han expresado su opinión, recordando a los atletas actuales su obligación de ser un modelo a seguir, especialmente dada la visibilidad de una Copa del Mundo. El consenso entre los oficiales de rugby es que la disciplina debe ser inflexible para mantener el espíritu del juego.
The broader context of discipline in women’s rugby
This situation contributes to the ongoing discussion about discipline and safety in women’s rugby. As the game intensifies and becomes more physical, prioritizing player safety has become essential for regulatory organizations. Offenses like biting, high tackles, and unsafe entries into the ruck are under close scrutiny, with tighter enforcement aiming to reduce hazards and promote respect among athletes.
The Women’s Rugby World Cup has become a showcase not only of athletic excellence but also of the values associated with rugby: respect, integrity, and solidarity. Officials are keen to reinforce these principles, using high-profile cases like Berthoumieu’s to underline the importance of discipline. The hope is that decisive actions will serve as an educational tool for players at all levels, from grassroots clubs to the professional stage.
An unexpected turning point
For Axelle Berthoumieu, the suspension represents a turning point in her career. Missing 12 matches in the context of international rugby is a considerable setback, both in terms of playing time and reputation. Whether she can rebuild her image will depend on her response to this sanction and her future conduct. For France, the immediate focus will be adapting their strategies to compensate for her absence, while also addressing questions about discipline within the team.
Ireland, on the other hand, carries on with its campaign where Wafer is not just acknowledged for her athletic prowess, but also seen as a representation of determination. The event has boosted her reputation and highlighted her skill in staying composed in difficult situations.
The disciplinary decision reflects a broader determination to safeguard rugby’s integrity as the sport continues to grow. By imposing strong sanctions on misconduct, officials aim to protect players, uphold the values of the game, and send a clear message to both participants and fans: respect and fair play remain non-negotiable, even on the biggest stage of all.
